Page 8 of 11

As I Go Along: The Sandman #1 ‘Preludes and Nocturnes’

Morning announcements: “As I Go Along” is a new weekly feature in which I will review and discuss the best graphic novels and series that I haven’t yet had a chance to read. These are the titles your comic-reading friends have been trying to push into your hands for years, only now I’ll be doing the pushing (or telling you not to bother). Ill be starting with the first volume of Neil Gaiman’s The Sandman, entitled “Preludes and Nocturnes.” Since this is the first one, there will be only minor spoilers, future posts will assume familiarity with the previous collections.

“People think dreams aren’t real just because they aren’t made of matter, of particles. Dreams are real. But they are made of viewpoints, of images, of memories and puns and lost hopes.”

Neil Gaiman is about as famous as a writer can get these days, and he’s won a veritable plethora of awards to boot. The story goes that in the late 80s,  Karen Berger, who’s now the executive editor of Vertigo, read Gaiman’s work and offered him a job rebooting an old character, The Sandman. Gaiman’s version, who goes by many names, including Dream and Morpheus,  is closer to that of mythology and fairy tales than his superhero predecessors. The character rules over all dreams and stories, essentially anything that isn’t “reality.” But he’s less a God and more an ageless anthropomorphic personification, the embodiment of the concept of dreams.

Everyone (by which I mean the Internet) keeps telling me that “Preludes and Nocturnes” is far from the strongest title in the series, both Gaiman and the editor say as much in the foreword. I’m only halfway through the second collection so I can’t speak to the veracity of that notion, but I enjoyed the hell out of “Preludes and Nocturnes,” so if that’s the case I’m beyond excited to see what’s to come.

The story begins in 1916, an occult group led by Roderick Burgess is attempting to capture Death to gain immortality. Burgess is a magician akin to Aleister Crowley, in fact in the DC Universe, Burgess is Crowley’s rival. Burgess’ plan goes awry and he captures Dream, Death’s little brother, instead. After being imprisoned for centuries, Dream escapes, seeks vengeance, and begins hunting down the tools that make him powerful.

What follows will be familiar to gamers,  it’s basically a fetch quest which serves as an extended, but necessary, introduction to the expansive world(s) in which Dream operates. He needs to reclaim his pouch of sand, helm, and ruby, and his quest takes him everywhere from Arkham Asylum, Justice League Headquarters, Hell, and his own realm, called “the Dreaming” (what else?).

Highlights include the first issue, detailing Dream’s imprisonment, his trip to hell and participation in a certain “game,” and the last issue, which serves as a sort of epilogue and shows Dream following his older sister Death around for a day. You won’t believe what she’s like, but you’ll love it.

Most of the complaints, namely that Gaiman was trying too hard both to fit his tale into the horror genre and the more overarching DC Universe, are valid. Along the way we see characters like Martian Manhunter, the Scarecrow and John Constantine (the guy Keanu Reeves played). I didn’t mind that stuff, but I could see it getting tiresome. However I’m told such appearances become infrequent, so it will become less of an issue as the series goes on.

It seems the best is yet to come, but “Preludes and Nocturnes” is still a highly enjoyable read. It’s clear Gaiman had a vision from the start. From halfway through the second edition, “The Doll’s House,” it’s apparent that there is a nigh unbelievable amount of foreshadowing and intertwining story lines. As a result of this and Gaiman’s writing, which is chock full of references, you might find it helpful to keep this page bookmarked. It’s an annotation of each issue, explaining references, reminding you of characters you forgot were introduced, etc. But wait until you finish the issue before reading the annotations, as there are spoilers.

Movies you should, but don’t need to see before ‘The Avengers’

 

They’re famous for their battle cry, news team, er, I mean, “Avengers, assemble!” Well, it’s finally happening, Joss Whedon’s “The Avengers” is coming out on Friday. The film, which has already grossed over $200 million overseas, is both the beginning of a franchise and the culmination of one. Marvel has been building towards this movie with post-credit scenes, cameos, and hints since 2008. As such, there are a few other movies you’ll want to check out to get the whole story. I’ll offer a quick rundown of them here, and the bold name at the top of each will link to its Bullz-eye review. If you’ve already seen them all and want an in-depth refresher on the hints, I highly recommend this post at Tor.com.

The great thing about about this little homework assignment is that all these movies are worth watching for their own sake. With the exception of “The Incredible Hulk,” each and every one has been “certified fresh” on Rotten Tomatoes. Whether or not that will be the case for the barrage of sequels that is soon to follow remains to be seen, but a man can dream.

Iron Man (2008)

This is where it all started. “Iron Man” is the story of billionaire playboy/industrialist/engineer Tony Stark, whose expert portrayal by Robert Downey Jr makes the film. Stark Industries is a high-tech weapons manufacturer. When the film begins, Tony is on a business trip in Afghanistan, where he’s wounded in a terrorist ambush. As he passes out he sees his company built the missile that did the damage. He’s kidnapped, builds a super suit, escapes, yada yada yada, before he’s back with a mission: preventing Stark Industries from selling any more weapons. “I have more to offer the world,” he says, “than making things blow up.” That’s when the real conflict begins.

Now, my biggest problem with superhero movies is that they always start with the origin story. That’s not how it happens in the comics, it can take years before we hear how so and so got his powers. But any writing teacher will tell you that you can break every rule in the book, as long as you do it right. “Iron Man” doesn’t so much break the rule as make you wonder why it’s a rule to begin with. No other Marvel film has handled an origin story quite so well.

While “The Avengers” will definitely come close, “Iron Man,” with its 94 rating on the Tomatometer, is the best Marvel adaptation so far and one of the best superhero movies of all time. Few films, let alone superhero films, are better than Christopher Nolan’s Batman reboots, but if they didn’t exist “Iron Man” would easily top the list.

Iron Man 2 (2010)

The sequel isn’t as good as the original, for a change. However, “Iron Man 2” is still a damn good movie. We’ve already seen Iron Man’s origin and Stark’s redemption, so it’s replaced by plenty of great action, and if nothing else, the film offers an excuse to give us more of Robert Downey Jr. in a role he was seemingly born to play.

The filmmakers recognized the inherent problems of sequel-making and addressed them head on. That self-awareness helped the finished product. For example, Don Cheadle replacing Terrence Howard could have been a big issue if they tried to sweep it under the rug. Instead, Cheadle’s first line, “It’s me, I’m here, deal with it and let’s move on,” calls attention to the change. This move gives the viewer no other choice but to do as he says and move on.

Stark has revealed his identity and been thrust into dispute with the U.S. government, which is “not exactly thrilled by the idea that a private citizen has been able to achieve world peace almost single-handedly, and instead want to militarize the technology for their own benefit.” Tony is also forced to battle with an army of Iron Men created by Russian physicist Ivan Vanko (Mickey Rourke), who’s teamed up with rival arms manufacturer Justin Hammer (Sam Rockwell). Two characters central to “The Avengers,” Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson) and Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) also get their first extended screen time.

The Incredible Hulk (2008)

“Hulk” is the worst film on the list, and the least necessary for understanding “The Avengers.” The 2008 film, which stars Edward Norton as mild-mannered scientist Bruce Banner, was an attempt to reboot the series following the disappointing 2003 version, which starred Eric Bana in the same role. Never fear, Mark Ruffalo has just signed a six-picture deal to play the Hulk.

Anyway, Banner is travelling the world trying to find the antidote to his condition. Of course, neither war profiteers who want to exploit him nor his supervillainous enemy The Abomination (Tim Roth) are quite OK with that. Since the Hulk is in “The Avengers,” it’s a fair guess Banner never finds that antidote. “Hulk” is a good film and well worth seeing, but it should be last on your list of pre-Avengers priorities.

Thor (2011)

“Thor” was directed by Kenneth Branagh, who I know best as “that Shakespeare guy,” and stars Chris Hemsworth in the title role. At first glance, the movie is a hard sell. Thor is a Norse thunder god from the fictional realm of Asgard. Contrast that with the other “Avengers” characters, who are mostly American, let alone Earthlings.

When he disobeys a command from his father, Odin (Anthony Hopkins), Thor is stripped of his magical hammer and banished to Earth, where he meets astrophysicist Jane Foster (Natalie Portman). Before long, Thor’s brother Loki (Tom Hiddleston), who’s been causing trouble back in Asgard, starts wreaking havoc on Earth as well. Believe it or not, epic god battles ensue. Loki returns as the main villain in “The Avengers.”

“Thor’s” release marked when the “Avengers” hype really started to take shape. The film finds a nice middle ground for connections between the two. While they’re certainly present, they aren’t given nearly as much screen time as they were in “Iron Man 2,” which is probably a good thing. Too many hints and such can bog down the story and prevent the film from being worthwhile for its own sake. Thor walked the line admirably.

Captain America: The First Avenger (2011)

Now things are really heating up, after all it’s right there in the title, Captain America is “the First Avenger.”

“Captain America” opens in the present day, with a S.H.I.E.L.D. team discovering the hero’s frozen body. Back in the 1940s, the U.S. has just entered into World War II. But the man won’t let Steve Rogers (Chris Evans) enlist because he’s too small. Eventually Rogers is offered a position in a secret super soldier program, and even after it’s a success they still won’t send him to battle. Instead, he’s used as a pitchman for war bonds. Rogers takes it upon himself to investigate Nazi scientist Johann Schmidt (Hugo Weaving) and end the war once and for all.

There’s all kinds of “Avengers” stuff floating around “Captain America.” Tony Stark’s father Howard is heavily involved in the super soldier program, and a big part of the plot revolves around the villains attempting to get the cosmic cube, an all powerful something that might just be able to open a portal to Asgard.

Comic-Con Episode IV: A Fan’s Hope

Here’s a review of Comic-Con Episode IV: A Fan’s Hope from Bob Westal:

Yeah, so it’s got a lousy title and it’s not earth-shattering cinema, but Morgan Spurlock’s entirely watchable and entertaining little Comic-Con movie accomplishes the task it sets for itself. In 88 minutes, we get a very decent gloss on the Comic-Con experience and just what it can mean for some people, minus the aching feet, sleep deprivation and $8.00 hot dogs.

Looks like he enjoyed it . . .

« Older posts Newer posts »